Many Scottish construction companies are dying a slow death because the Scottish Government’s flagship procurement policy excludes them from competing for public work.
Following the 2006 McClelland Report on value in public procurement, the Scottish Government has used “bundled contracts”, frameworks and hubs. The effect has been to freeze out smaller contractors who cannot compete for these high-value contracts.
Alex Neil, the Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure, last month sought to lay the blame for this mess at the foot of the EU and the Westminster Government. Speaking in Fort William, Neil said Scotland was forbidden to consider the economic impact of a contract when tendering, which is why local companies often lose out to foreign contractors making slightly lower tenders.
Neil is obviously making political points but he must know that EU rules for works procurement don’t apply to contracts below £3.9 million, which comprise up to 35% of the total. Below this value, the rules for procurement are set by national governments and public authorities are free to set their own procurement processes and priorities.
The argument that smaller contractors should work in the supply chain of bigger suppliers is a red herring. Many smaller businesses know that this exposes them to difficult contract conditions and poor payment practices, recently exemplified by ROK and Connaught going bust owing millions.
If the Scottish Government had the will it could change its policy in a couple of months and give SMEs a chance. My experience leaves no doubt about business frustration with the Scottish Government and incomprehension about why it has chosen to go this way. Businesses want action and they can’t wait for any more studies, workshops or political point-scoring.